New leaked p3 advanced leak
- Thread starter Mal_PV2_Ireland
- Start date
- Status
ianwood
Taco Wrangler
You're making sweeping statements that wreak of prejudice and are not constructive to the conversation. Please stop.
Oso
Premium Pilot
When I joined the forum, I was looking forward to the amazing knowledge base. I was also hoping to see dramatic stories about close calls while flying, actual crashes with data, or about irate drone hating neighbors. You know, things that we could all learn from as a community and have some fun with as well. We have had all of the above which is awesome, but I never expected the kind of low brow drama in this thread. Funny thing is that I can't stop reading. It's like the roadside accident you can't look away from even though you feel bad looking.
Personally, I love knowing that something cool is coming soon. It keeps me excited and interested in the hobby, and also keeps me faithful to DJI rather than jumping ship to a nascent startup. We all know from experience that DJI is very poor with communication, so just knowing that something is confirmed to be in the works really helps a lot with keeping up customer loyalty and patience.
Also, blade please reconsider. Perhaps take some time away and then come back refreshed and ready to help the community again if you are so inclined.
Cheers to all.
Personally, I love knowing that something cool is coming soon. It keeps me excited and interested in the hobby, and also keeps me faithful to DJI rather than jumping ship to a nascent startup. We all know from experience that DJI is very poor with communication, so just knowing that something is confirmed to be in the works really helps a lot with keeping up customer loyalty and patience.
Also, blade please reconsider. Perhaps take some time away and then come back refreshed and ready to help the community again if you are so inclined.
Cheers to all.
The "leak" only references data that the SENSOR is capable of. The sensor being poorly utilized in the past is a fault. Its finally being more properly utilized is hardly rocket science, much less copyright-able! That like saying that NO ONE can use THAT sensor to produce THOSE results without paying DJI for the rights. Of which we all know is BS because other companies are already doing it. Next?What drives the sensor?
It took a lot of hard work but u got it done Mal! Who would have thought your name would be on a sticky...
It seems your take on reality is something of a fantastic. Software and firmware are codes they are written. This is what drives the sensor. This is copyrightable and DJI holds to copyright.
What facts do you have that suggest the sensor is "poorly utilized" Are you going to say that people who bought the Pro is poorly utilized there Phantom? Most people don't even have a computer that can edit 4k let alone a monitor to show it. Your point is moot about the sensor...
No I have no issues reading... You say the sensor is poorly used... and that the sensor's copyright isn't held by DJI...
You haven't even said anything about the possessor
or the firmware that runs it...
Or why DJI did what they did.
If I read into your statement you are saying that DJI engineers are stupid and don't know what they are doing... And if I read even further you, the most intellect here could use the sensor much better. And your firmware wouldn't be copyrighted...
The camera was obviously poorly utilised if it's capable of 2.7k all along
Hard to imagine, in the scheme of things, a less important thing to get all worked up over. Geez.
No fan in the standard or Advance.
There is a diferances between the Pro and Advance in Video processing.
Same sensor but different handling of the data.
Standard has a completely different camera unit.
It's always been known the Advance sensor is capable of more than 1080P.
It's more like what Intel do with CPUs, same chip and limit it in lower models.
I'm bowing out of this thread now as Iv said my bit, wish you all happy lives.
There is a diferances between the Pro and Advance in Video processing.
Same sensor but different handling of the data.
Standard has a completely different camera unit.
It's always been known the Advance sensor is capable of more than 1080P.
It's more like what Intel do with CPUs, same chip and limit it in lower models.
I'm bowing out of this thread now as Iv said my bit, wish you all happy lives.
Last edited:
The fan on the "gimble" is for the camera's processor. All of the stuff for the camera (besides the sensor) is in there...
4k takes a lot of processing prower and that equals heat... the advance has a different processor asaik...
Oso
Premium Pilot
Since the topic has to do with adding 2.7k video to the P3A, you have a good question. Does adding 2.7k video mean the P3A may also need a fan? We all know the P3P has the fan on the gimbal, noted as being needed for the 4k video. At what level does the fan become a necessary addition? My guess is that since the P3S has no fan, the P3A should also be fine. Maybe the fan is now one of the differentiators between the P3P and the P3A. Too bad a fan can't be added to the P3A without opening the shell.
Yeah they both effectively use the same sensor. This is a common thing that manufacturers do. I am not disagreeing that Pro shouldn't be able to do 2.7k, chances are DJI might enable that in firmware for us in the future, who knows..
Oso
Premium Pilot
I tend to think of it as strategically utilized to provide a differentiating factor between the P3P and the P3A when they were new. One sensor for both models means no need to add to manufacturing and supply chain complexity by sourcing for two different sensors. Now several months in with the P3S already released, some functionality can be strategically unlocked in the P3A.
This is very common in the high tech industry.
- Status
