Absolutely. I should have added to my post that where there is no cell service, Trackimo is useless. One thing to note about MP, which I have tested, is that you need to have an approximate starting point to begin RDF. A fellow ham operator and I put this to the test. His task was to "plant" the module anywhere within a 2 mile radius (the claimed distance), and then I would try to find it. I was never able to find it. He placed it in a yard only about a mile from me, and although I drove around for 30 minutes, I never picked up a signal. This is a con with the MP. If you have a flyaway, and you have no idea where the drone may be, it may prove very difficult to find. Another con is that the 900MhZ signal is easily blocked by terrain, buildings, etc. All of these type of devices are very limited in power output per FCC regs. The beauty of the Trackimo is that if there is cell service, this thing will provide instant accurate location data anywhere in the world. If someone steals your drone, they better know how to turn the Trackimo off. When I go on motorcycle trips, I hide the Trackimo on the bike.I have both a Trackimo and Marco Polo -- and, I definitely agree that the Trackimo is easier to use tracking-wise. However, if often flying in remote areas that have spotty cell service (or none at all), the Marco Polo would definitely be the better choice.