GadgetGuy
Premium Pilot
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2015
- Messages
- 6,881
- Reaction score
- 2,199
Makes sense! It also makes it impossible to prove warranty coverage, which saves millions/billions by denying all warranty claims, and helps promote sales of DJI Care/Refresh! Follow the money, both in terms of profit and liability! Saves $5 per aircraft, too, and untold time extracting and reviewing incriminating .DAT files, proving warranty coverage should apply!I surmise this is a Brendan Shulman move to have deniability if the craft fails and causes major damage to someone or something. If there is no proof of craft failure, it's the pilots liability. Minimizing liability exposure for DJI is Brendan's job. This also makes the craft cheaper to manufacture, as a side benefit.
Brendan
View attachment 92390