Sorry t
What is interesting here is that the props are seemingly nothing more than repurposed faux carbon fibre phantom 3 units. We can reasonably expect they might spin off in flight. As was the case on the phantom 3, active breaking isn't a new feature to the phantom 4, it was introduced when DJI implemented the Texas Instruments 3 phase motor driver SOC with the 3 series.
I'm with you in recommending OEM props. The standard phantom 4 units are carbon fibre impregnated nylon- very likely superior to most if not all aftermarket alternatives despite what the marketing blurb might suggest.
Sorry tcope- the "?" at the end of your post, for me at least, suggested you were looking for clarity.The only think I mentioned was torque. Speeding up is not speed (as in higher RPMs), it's mentioning torque.
But not sure why that really matters. My point is still valid and does not require much detail.
Those props are 100% crap and should not even be sold. I've always been critical of those people who buy into this "carbon fiber" prop thing. It's a waste of money at best.
What is interesting here is that the props are seemingly nothing more than repurposed faux carbon fibre phantom 3 units. We can reasonably expect they might spin off in flight. As was the case on the phantom 3, active breaking isn't a new feature to the phantom 4, it was introduced when DJI implemented the Texas Instruments 3 phase motor driver SOC with the 3 series.
I'm with you in recommending OEM props. The standard phantom 4 units are carbon fibre impregnated nylon- very likely superior to most if not all aftermarket alternatives despite what the marketing blurb might suggest.