- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 87
I don't know how they could have gotten away with this.
If they invalidated the first two offenses, one being that the man was not legally able to fly his quad in a national park, how could they have the right to detain him if they couldn't prove he was breaking the law in the first place?
A police officer doesn't have the right to detain you and use force for nothing. Unless of course it was a plea deal, but I wouldn't think that would work....
Yes, I am all for the first charge. It is illegal to fly a drone in a national park. However, if they didn't find he was doing something illigal, how in the world would it be justified for them to taze him?
FYI, I do think the guy seems like an idiot, just questioning the law here...
Judge: Park ranger’s use of taser on drone operator was justified - sUAS News
If they invalidated the first two offenses, one being that the man was not legally able to fly his quad in a national park, how could they have the right to detain him if they couldn't prove he was breaking the law in the first place?
A police officer doesn't have the right to detain you and use force for nothing. Unless of course it was a plea deal, but I wouldn't think that would work....
Yes, I am all for the first charge. It is illegal to fly a drone in a national park. However, if they didn't find he was doing something illigal, how in the world would it be justified for them to taze him?
FYI, I do think the guy seems like an idiot, just questioning the law here...
Judge: Park ranger’s use of taser on drone operator was justified - sUAS News