I've read a lot of posts in other forums and here. There's a statement people utter and is almost looked at as a fact and never challenged. The consensus seems to be "the phantom is not as capable as other larger sized multirotors". People seem to think of phantom as a toy and incapable of doing professional work. I don't completely understand how? I do know that
1) Inability to handle excessive windspeeds over 20mph
2) Inability to carry more weight.
Yes , the phantom 2 is RTF but there is a huge mod community (and most of our P2s' run mods/add-ons) and that is because of the fact that everything in there is swappable. The smaller frame size seems to make it perfect for transportation and longer flight times. I dont' intend to be ignorant as I've only had so much experience. I'd appreciate it if people shed some light as to why the P2 is only a "gateway" to a larger multirotor setup.
1) Inability to handle excessive windspeeds over 20mph
2) Inability to carry more weight.
Yes , the phantom 2 is RTF but there is a huge mod community (and most of our P2s' run mods/add-ons) and that is because of the fact that everything in there is swappable. The smaller frame size seems to make it perfect for transportation and longer flight times. I dont' intend to be ignorant as I've only had so much experience. I'd appreciate it if people shed some light as to why the P2 is only a "gateway" to a larger multirotor setup.