Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

Windsurfer reflective surface considerations

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by WetDog, Sep 16, 2016.

  1. WetDog

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    640
    Many of the threads on the Windsurfer type antenna booster talk about the kind and arrangement of the metallic material used as the reflector. Typically aluminum or copper tape or sheet is used. One area of concern is how smooth the surface needs to be in order to prevent losses from spurious reflection.

    I've been doing some research on microwave antennas and came across this paragraph in the ARRL Antenna Book, 22cd edition (page 15-59). The specific discussion is for parabolic reflectors but the passive element reflector design of the Windsurfer should follow the same physics.

    At 2.4 GHz that comes out to 1.25 cm / 8 = .15 cm = 1.5 mm. That is a comfortably large number for smoothness. So, assuming no other factors are involved, any reasonably smooth surface should be adequate.

    Any thoughts?
     
    Ken Hanks likes this.
  2. brothers

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    17
    I think they're referring to how close to a mathematical parabola the reflector is, with the radiating element at the focus of the parabola, not to the smoothness of the surface.
     
  3. WetDog

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    640
    There is certainly that concern - I'm working on that now in terms of optimization, but there are a number of threads were folks obsess about the need for surface smoothness. At least what I can determine, you needn't worry about that unless you are particularly clumsy.
     
  4. N017RW

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    6,253
    Likes Received:
    1,615
    Location:
    Palm Beach Co.- FL
    Looks like there's an error of one order of magnitude for the initial wavelength @ 2.4 GHz.

    It should be 125 mm or 12.5 cm (4.92"), not 1.25 cm.

    Thus 1/8 wave would be 15.6 mm (.615").
     
    WetDog likes this.
  5. WetDog

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    640
    ****. Hate that. But that makes it even more tolerant....

    Thanks for the pickup.
     
  6. Mark The Droner

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2015
    Messages:
    4,026
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Location:
    Brookeville, MD, USA
    Ever make one of those homemade windsurfers? I did - and the surface can be described a lot of ways, but smooth isn't one of them. Yet it seems to work okay.
     
  7. WetDog

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    640
    Yes, that's the point. Doesn't really need to be a mirror.