Why 3840 over 4096? More pixels always better?

[Linux&OS/2]

My main OS and program drive (C) is the older Samsung 950 Pro PCIe SSD that has a read/write speed of 2400MB/sec//1500MB/sec. This is also my scratch disk for Adobe. I maintain my image and video archive on two 6TB WB Black HD's and they are in the 200MB/sec range or a bit faster. I built my editing PC a year and a half ago and hopefully in another 1.5 years I'll build another using even better CPU's and GPU's. My current kit uses an Intel 5820K that's OC'd a bit and my GPU is the older nVidia 980 Ti -- both are water cooled. The latest gen CPU's and GPU's are supposed to natively support H.265 whereas neither my CPU or GPU do.


Brian

I will have one 1080 ti turbo. Mobo: ASUS Z10PE-D16 Workstation.Cpu's are xeons E5-2640 V4.
Samsung 1000GB 850 evo (around 500MB/s) for the original video's.
500GB 850 evo for OS (linux) ubuntu 16.4
2 10TB WD gold for results. in stripping
Blender as videoprocessing, ffmpeg as converter.
1080ti can handle h265 as you say.

Marc.

 

[nomnomnom]

why did this turned into a computer discussion...

 

[hedonist222]

why did this turned into a computer discussion...

Because our bodies don't have input ports to see video directly from a memory card. Yet.
Therefore computers matter.