I doubt there is a definitive answer to this question, but perhaps there is at least some anecdotal evidence one way or another. My range isn't great, less than minimum advertised, which is surprising considering I fly in semi-remote high desert areas. I get great RC control signal, but video craps out much beyond 1000 feet and doesn't return until I fly closer. I know that's worse than most people get.
Apparently the P3P carries more data on the video downlink than does the P3A, which theoretically speaking may reduce the range. I own a P3P, and am now wondering if the P3A would have been a better choice for my needs. I don't really use the 4K video, I just tend to buy the best I can get when I have choices.
I know "range" is subject to significant variability even for the same bird, but if the P3P is generally less likely to match the P3A due to the signal burden, it would be good to know.
Again, not expecting anyone to really know the answer to this, but open to speculation and anecdotes that may inform my decision to change to the other bird.
Thanks
Apparently the P3P carries more data on the video downlink than does the P3A, which theoretically speaking may reduce the range. I own a P3P, and am now wondering if the P3A would have been a better choice for my needs. I don't really use the 4K video, I just tend to buy the best I can get when I have choices.
I know "range" is subject to significant variability even for the same bird, but if the P3P is generally less likely to match the P3A due to the signal burden, it would be good to know.
Again, not expecting anyone to really know the answer to this, but open to speculation and anecdotes that may inform my decision to change to the other bird.
Thanks