krunkcopter said:slothead said:My preference is the Standard for the video, but I like the capability of the hard setting for raw still (DNG) images. It takes more post processing to make use of the Hard sharpening in the stills (using Photoshop CS6), and without that post processing the JPGs work a lot better (but don't need the Hard sharpening.
This makes no sense.
The whole purpose of shooting RAW is so that you have greater control over your image in post. Sharpening in post will always be better what the weak processor can achieve in-camera.
Using in-camera hard sharpening on a RAW capture defeats one of the main advantages of capturing RAW.
Normally that would be true , but it doesn't seem to work here. So you do what you want Krunk, and I'll do what I want. It may not sound like it makes sense, but I tried it and that is my conclusion. (Note: my tests were limited to a very narrow range of lighting and contrast which could make a big difference, but it's what I saw this evening.)krunkcopter said:slothead said:My preference is the Standard for the video, but I like the capability of the hard setting for raw still (DNG) images. It takes more post processing to make use of the Hard sharpening in the stills (using Photoshop CS6), and without that post processing the JPGs work a lot better (but don't need the Hard sharpening.
This makes no sense.
The whole purpose of shooting RAW is so that you have greater control over your image in post. Sharpening in post will always be better what the weak processor can achieve in-camera.
Using in-camera hard sharpening on a RAW capture defeats one of the main advantages of capturing RAW.
4wd said:In a video from one flight it seemed to be changing from the blueish cloudy setting to the yellowish daylight setting as I tilted the camera down - I thought I had set it manually to 'sunny'.