Hello I've been mostly flying the Mavic air 2 lately because of the smaller size and it seems to attract less attention when setting up to fly.
My question is that I perceive that the phantom 4 pro doesn't keep as steady in low/no wind conditions as the air 2.
I haven't done a very recent IMU and compass cal on either unit but not showing any anomalies either.
I was thinking that it's a matter of having faster processors and better algorithms but then I wonder if there's something not right about the phantom.
The issue is not severe in any way but makes the phantom less desirable for things like timed exposure and hyper-laps shots.
The effect is pretty subtle but I have a few hundred hours flying these guys.
My question is that I perceive that the phantom 4 pro doesn't keep as steady in low/no wind conditions as the air 2.
I haven't done a very recent IMU and compass cal on either unit but not showing any anomalies either.
I was thinking that it's a matter of having faster processors and better algorithms but then I wonder if there's something not right about the phantom.
The issue is not severe in any way but makes the phantom less desirable for things like timed exposure and hyper-laps shots.
The effect is pretty subtle but I have a few hundred hours flying these guys.