Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

Parachute Gives Falling Drones a Chance (video in link)

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Batman, May 14, 2015.

  1. Batman

    Joined:
    May 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. jason

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,117
    Likes Received:
    405
    Location:
    Commerce Twp,MI
    The problem with that is the canister would not fit between the props on any P2 or P3.
     
  3. IflyinWY

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    939
    Location:
    Where the deer and the antelope play
    Batman likes this.
  4. Oesau

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2015
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    It's still well short of the target, shame...
     
  5. Ezookiel

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    153
    Location:
    Canberra Australia
    Probably because it won't fit the P2 which is one of the most common drones out there, nor the P3 which will likely end up catching up to the P2 in popularity.
    One I looked at would fit but ONLY IF you drop to using the 8" props.
    They're not going to succeed by telling people they can use their product but only by dropping the speed and takeoff weight of their craft (while adding the weight of the chute system).
    I think something like this is a brilliant idea, and would love to see one up and running that is cheaper than the existing systems, but it's going to have to do it without asking people to drop the size of their props.
     
  6. Batman

    Joined:
    May 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    They now support 9" props for the P2 and P3: https://www.kickstarter.com/project...opter-parachute-recovery-system/posts/1230953
     
  7. Ezookiel

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    153
    Location:
    Canberra Australia
  8. andrewket2

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2014
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    4
    I'm in.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  9. Bocephus-73

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    63
    Overall the idea of a parachute system is fairly ridiculous for a $1,000 quadcopter. It's a disposable product just like an iPhone. You drop it and it breaks --- you get a new one.

    The only real use I see out of systems like this are for commercial drone operators who fly over large groups of people. Liability insurance for UAVs will most likely require this as a safety feature so that bodily harm is greatly mitigated.
     
  10. Oesau

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2015
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    There's a huge market for iPhone cases for the same reason: to protect your purchase. Anyway, I personally see there is market for it, IF it doesn't impair performance to a large degree though for the most part I fly over water so the end result is likely to be the same :)
     
  11. Ezookiel

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    153
    Location:
    Canberra Australia
    My P2 is around $3,500 not $1000, so I don't consider it disposable.
    The GoPro H4 Black was something like $600 alone, as was the gimbal, so that's a lot to lose in a crash.

    Secondly, my biggest concern isn't the quad, it's property. Have it smash down onto the bonnet of someone's Audi, Merc, et al, and the cost of the quad will be small fry. Hit a person at the same time, and the insurance company will be studying every single frame of the video to find a way to skimp on the claim - go just 1" over the legal height limit, or beyond VLOS, or break any other law related to the use of these, and you're not covered.
    So yes, I'm keen on anything that will potentially bring it down safely.
     
    Hughie likes this.
  12. Hughie

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Messages:
    1,477
    Likes Received:
    141
    Location:
    Leeds, United Kingdom
    I completely agree. Saying that a parachute is irrelevant because the aircraft is disposable is just missing the point. If my Phantom drops out of the sky 400' up and travels sideways and down it could go anywhere and hit anyone. I know only too well how insurers do not stop wriggling until they are sure they have to pay up. I understand that even the BMFA insurers who are insurers of some repute, recently wriggled out of a R/C claim because the aircraft appeared to be fitted with long range equipment.

    Having said that, they would have to be a limit to the cost of a parachute relative to the aircraft. It is all a matter of risk balance.
     
  13. DrChris

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    76
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    It's great that they are supporting larger props and the P3. One thing I noticed on the Kickstarter page was that they recommend flying above 50m to give the parachute time to deploy. Also, the parachute deploys on tip over, free fall or flip.

    Some people in our community almost always fly over 50m, but many others do not. In fact, almost all of the crashes that have been reported on the P3 Discussion forum are from much lower altitude and with crash details that don't involve free fall, tip or flip over.

    This seems like a truly interesting device but one should consider they type of flying that you do and the types of incidents that you are protecting against.

    Chris
     
  14. Ezookiel

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    153
    Location:
    Canberra Australia
    Ideally, any chute system needs to deploy on detection of rapid descent.
    But you sure wouldn't want this thing going off on false readings, and nor would you want it to be too slow to notice a rapid descent.
    I don't envy people doing this sort of research and development, it has to be pretty hard to come up with something that is going to work reliably in all situations.