Warning: total off-topic, skip this post if you're just here to fix discussed issue.
Ha, there's way, way more actions on Dji side which would be unacceptable for EU or US citizens. I bet sometimes Dji employees don't even realize what they do is controversial.
There are many claims against Dji which we can't (or don't have enough will to) fully verify. Western corporations tend to avoid anything which could be perceived as anti-consumer. Dji either lacks that "correctness", or their actions really are targeted at monopolizing the segment and controlling the consumers.
Looking at the electronics within Dji products, Ph3 and Ph4 was kind of laptop-grade, and newer drones go into more Smartphone-grade technology. And most people replace their smartphones every 2 years. So it doesn't look like the longevity will improve with new generations.
Design flaws happen to every company. What is different for Dji is that they never publicly acknowledge them or offer any compensation. And that would be bad by itself, but the fact that Dji forces users to update, even though this leads to some percentage of the platforms no longer working... In the western world, companies do get sued for artificial aging.
The more I am into the drone world, the more I love the products Dji makes, and the more I despite Dji as a company.
There must be a lot of passionate people at Dji. And a few greedy ones as well.