Actually, most US states have rules against the average layperson creating topographic maps, orthomosaics, providing georeferenced imagery, etc. The reason for this is because the average layperson isn't a licensed surveyor or engineer and providing bad data can have real life consequences. How many of these "pop-ups" are carrying errors and omission or liability insurance if their map is off? Who's going to foot the bill when someone uses that data to plan a subdivision and they use the wrong coordinate system? If you think this can't happen, then a quick search for surveyor lawsuits might change your mind. The farther into cadastral and design mapping territory that a UAV operator ventures, the more important it is to understand the product being produced, and I don't have a lot of confidence in those that don't know the difference between a checkpoint and a GCP, or those using a cloud-based product to deliver to their client. This isn't driving, this is survey-grade mapping.