Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

FAA Wants to Issue $10,000 Fine for Drone Video

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by lgeist, May 2, 2014.

  1. lgeist

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
  2. Monte55

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2014
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    517
    Location:
    Raymore Missouri
    I thought it was a cool video. What happened there?
     
  3. QYV

    QYV

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,814
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    NYC
    what do you mean? the tornado? or the fact that using a drone to capture footage even for use as "reporting" is considered "commercial purpose" which is currently banned by FAA regulations?
     
  4. Monte55

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2014
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    517
    Location:
    Raymore Missouri
    I was talking about the damage. I suspected tornado or the like. Was this video sold? Or just the fact someone used it on the news? So, I can sit in a field and shoot video...that's ok.....but if its up in the air, its illegal? Bs is my thought. So let's say my house in on fire and I take my Phantom off and video it and it's on the news...I'm in violation?
     
  5. borgqueenx

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    14
    No definatly not. It seems you have desame law as here in europe.
    Film whatever you want, and publish whatever you want- as long as you dont get any form of reward for that. If its on youtube you didnt gain anything by that. But news articles can use it. But thats up to them.
     
  6. Hovtech

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2014
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    151
    Article in today's Chicago Tribune talks about this very issue. The feeling is this will go all the way to the Supreme Court if the FAA does another large fine and the company takes it to court.
     
  7. SilentAV8R

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Orange County, CA - USA
  8. Suwaneeguy

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2014
    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    22
    Apparently, the FAA hasn't gotten the message from the NTSB.
    Using their very own words, the NTSB basically said, "CEASE AND DESIST"
    The FAA can not issue a citation because there is no law!
    They can not take action because they have no authority to do so!
    When will they learn?
     
  9. SilentAV8R

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Orange County, CA - USA

    Upon the FAA appeal the NTSB decision was stayed.
     
  10. lgeist

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
  11. derrickduff

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2014
    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fortunately even before this trial the FAA's regulatory authority over model aircraft was very unclear. At best because of the absence of any regulation commercial use was completely legal. The FAA's claim on the decision being stayed doesn't change this. An appeal doesn't bring non existent laws into existence.

    Unfortunately the FAA can and will continue to issue fines despite the lack of laws or authority to do so. It will come down to those willing and able to hire an attorney good enough to prove whether or not what they did was legal.

    If I recall correctly the original trail and fine was over safety. The formal complaint didn't even mention, or was not based on commercial application of an UAV. Perhaps they are going to try a different route with this latest news coverage from a UAV.