SteveMann said:It's vaporware.
Think of it - if they could develop a killer drone that hunts and takes down other drones, that means the killer drone has to find, identify and target another flying object. There is an immense market for that technology that could be repurposed from 'see and attack' to 'see and avoid'.
NEVER...is such a long time...TeamYankee said:This would never work.. let's be honest!
Guess what...there is a whole world out there...outside the influence/rules of the FAATeamYankee said:A Legal nightmare for one.. and the FAA "LOS" rules...
Agreed!TeamYankee said:Anyway, a better option would be to carry on onboard 2.4Ghz /5.8Ghz jammer.. therefor causing a RTH scenario and loss of FPV.
Khudson7 said:NEVER...is such a long time...TeamYankee said:This would never work.. let's be honest!
Khudson7 said:Guess what...there is a whole world out there...outside the influence/rules of the FAATeamYankee said:A Legal nightmare for one.. and the FAA "LOS" rules...
Khudson7 said:Agreed!TeamYankee said:Anyway, a better option would be to carry on onboard 2.4Ghz /5.8Ghz jammer.. therefor causing a RTH scenario and loss of FPV.
There is a whole world outside of the FCC..... There, before someone else says it.Except radio jammers are illegal per the FCC.