I just upgraded from P2V+ to P3P. I have an empirical observation...is it true? It looks like my .jpgs of P2P+ look better than the new P3P .jpegs... could it be that the 14Ms are better than the 12Ms? I thought that the fact that the P3P had a better sensor was going to be helpful on obtaining much better pictures. Or can it be that I am using the wrong settings for my camera? I appreciate your comments.
Are the pictures of P2V+ .jpg better than P3P .jpgs?
- Thread starter lalvar40
- Start date
alokbhargava
Premium Pilot
It seems you still love your P2P+
I doubt if you can find out the differences by naked eyes. Compare your settings, light conditions and the subject that you photographed.
I doubt if you can find out the differences by naked eyes. Compare your settings, light conditions and the subject that you photographed.
Also the P2V+ has a fisheye lens. So anything after a certain distance is going to be warped. As mentioned, I think it's probably just a settings difference. I do think photos looked very good from the P2V+ camera though.
I do commercial photography and videography with my P3P and the images and video are amazing! I have both images and video on TV commercials right now and the quality is flawless.
Similar threads
