I'm not in the US and puzzled by this entire 333 thing ... What's the government's logic behind why you need legal status (333) to sell an image from a drone, while without one you can still hang out of a helicopter, plane, ultralight, hot air balloon, parachute, whatever... take an image and make a profit from it? It seems almost unbelievable to be true... that an organization responsible for the safety of the air can actually impose such a rule and be so involved in the economics of aerial imagery. Don't get me wrong... I totally understand the need for basic drone guidelines that are issued in the interest of public safety by the FAA. It's the part about telling someone what they can and can't do with the images that I find rather unbelievable.
Sent from my iPhone using PhantomPilots mobile app