I am going to risk being flamed here ..............
1. We see a clip of the video and have to trust person posting it that it is complete for the events stated. It is not unknown for 'clips' to be edited ..... I am only saying and not accusing.
2. This I base on the posts by the OP after receiving replies : I wonder what the exchange of words were with the person complaining about 'claimed overfly' ? I would hope that OP had a more relaxed - reasonable tone than has become apparent in posts here ?
The problem like many posted - is we only get to hear / read one side of the story. We have no idea why the guy refused to view the video ....
Remember Hogwarts - the guy who had the woman prosecuted for arguing with him after he overflew people on the beach ... few weeks later bragged about it ? It then turned out his video used as evidence was EDITED !!
Plus not long after posted a Youtube firing a gun of a Multi Rotor (quadcopter) ....
It was also later publicised about his School attendance behaviour etc. ......
This of course when revealed showed a completely different light than he'd claimed when the woman objected to his overflying the beach.
I am not accusing OP here .... I am just illustrating how difficult it is to actually come to a conclusion when not all parties are at hand.
Nigel
I do have to agree here. There are some unreasonable people out there that will fly off the handle with little provocation. However, in general I find people generally have some kind of reason to be so intolerant (not that they’re right per say).
As mentioned by another poster, the neighbor could very well angry about something else and is using the drone fly by as an excuse to create a confrontation. But at the end of the day, if he doesn’t want a drone flying over his yard, why give him reason to make a bigger issue out of it?