Stabilization comparisons

Joined
Sep 18, 2013
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hey I did a quick comparison between a few stabilization software (Final cut pro, Final cut pro with a plugin and Premier Warp Stabilization). Like to hear which you think is more stable.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmaPL01YJ2c[/youtube]
 
Which one is in the middle, seems good. And the right too.
For what Ive tried, the adobe premiere is by far the best but also takes very long time to render :/
 
Get a gimbal. Then you don't need to use stabilisation software at all.
All post-processed stabilisation looks weird to me.
 
rilot said:
Get a gimbal. Then you don't need to use stabilisation software at all.
All post-processed stabilisation looks weird to me.

I wholeheartedly agree, although there have been a few occasions where a wee bit of post stabilization has helped with yaw wobbles - but just about any stabilization software can deal with that.
 
Actually the sad thing is that this is shot with the zemuse. But the yaw is really horrible with wind. Even with software it still looks shaky :(
 
You can still have a gimbal and then have great use of stabilisation. Just needa use some of the best stabilisers out there. adobe or that free one that comes with virtual dub deshaker.

This is shot with gimbal and then stabilized http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRVtN-ELOjQ

It was abit windy, if it had been completely silent weather, I might didn't need stabilize.
 

Recent Posts

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
143,094
Messages
1,467,591
Members
104,979
Latest member
jrl