So Called Anti-Paparazzi Law

[Flying Cephlopod]

One voice of concern that many on this forum have expressed is concern about are people who object to UAV or "drones" or being photographed by a UAV.

The title is misleading, but that's how the media have reported this issue:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-24294901

Some snippets from the article:

"Bill 606, championed by actress Halle Berry, who testified before the state assembly, sets out to protect the children of those in the public eye."

"It lays out penalties for taking photos and video of a child without parental consent and in a harassing manner."

"The law comes into effect in January. Those breaking it could receive between 10 days and one year in jail, as well as a fine of up to $10,000 (£6,252).

"The bill also allows for parents to bring a civil action against violators to seek damages and legal fees."

What does that mean for anyone in any public space with any camera who is photographing an event, where minors are not the subject matter but are incidentally in the photo? A crowd of people, a parade, a street scene, and a performance come to mind as examples. It shouldn't matter whether a camera is hand-held or on a UAV.

I'm not asking about the celebrity status or if the photography is of any commercial intent.