Sigh
One more time.
I know exactly what is going on and your commentary is patronizing at best.
Please do not presume to lecture me ever again on the law or any other matter.
I believe that you may have ulterior motives for you position and couch your commentary in a way that will scare off others from debating you.
So what if the FAA has to start over with a new proposed rule. A screwed up rule needs to be fixed, not left in place because it's better than something that MAY BE worse. A concerted effort by a large group of knowledgeable citizens will ameliorate that possibility.
I have no idea why you state the obvious in your last two paragraphs. We ALL know that incident reports are not accident reports and that the media sucks. I am not sure what it adds to your argument.
Let me clarify all this. Even if signing the petition accomplishes nothing (and according to your arguments it had no chance of changing anything), it states a person's beliefs that the current and proposed rules are overly regulatory for the stated purpose.
I am not willing to take scraps when there is a roast on the table. And I refuse to pay someone else for my right to a piece of the roast. Therefore it is my position that training from "certified" airman teaching outrageously expensive classes to perfectly capable UAV owners is legislation which specifically economically benefits a class of people. Government may not do so without significant governmental interests (ie safety) being served.
One more time.
I know exactly what is going on and your commentary is patronizing at best.
Please do not presume to lecture me ever again on the law or any other matter.
I believe that you may have ulterior motives for you position and couch your commentary in a way that will scare off others from debating you.
So what if the FAA has to start over with a new proposed rule. A screwed up rule needs to be fixed, not left in place because it's better than something that MAY BE worse. A concerted effort by a large group of knowledgeable citizens will ameliorate that possibility.
I have no idea why you state the obvious in your last two paragraphs. We ALL know that incident reports are not accident reports and that the media sucks. I am not sure what it adds to your argument.
Let me clarify all this. Even if signing the petition accomplishes nothing (and according to your arguments it had no chance of changing anything), it states a person's beliefs that the current and proposed rules are overly regulatory for the stated purpose.
I am not willing to take scraps when there is a roast on the table. And I refuse to pay someone else for my right to a piece of the roast. Therefore it is my position that training from "certified" airman teaching outrageously expensive classes to perfectly capable UAV owners is legislation which specifically economically benefits a class of people. Government may not do so without significant governmental interests (ie safety) being served.