Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

Pirker Case Alternative Interpretation

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by SilentAV8R, Apr 30, 2014.

  1. SilentAV8R

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Orange County, CA - USA
  2. BruceTS

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Granada Hills CA
    that whole article is a joke, so many holes in her arguments that I don't even know where to begin. lets just wait till the board makes it decision (which most already know the answer) For now the FAA is using smoke and mirrors...they can be ignored.

    go here for a true understanding of the laws in play.
    http://dronelawjournal.com/
     
  3. SilentAV8R

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Orange County, CA - USA
    While I agree the FAA is on thin ice in general, I also know that you cannot simply ignore them. Once they decide to target you they can make your life very unpleasant with legal proceedings. Harass and Intimidate I think is their new approach.
     
  4. BruceTS

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Granada Hills CA
    if it went that far, then there's this great attorney that would love to take the case and counter sue the FAA for harassment.

    I'll just ignore any letter I'd happen to get, if I film and they try and come after me.