Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

MIssissippi Bill Introduced about UAV

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by dnthomas, Feb 11, 2016.

  1. dnthomas

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    16
    They have reintroduced it this year. Basically prohibits you from using your camera on a drone.
     
  2. Meta4

    Meta4 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,750
    Likes Received:
    3,462
    That appears to be a particularly nasty one.
    It doesn't have the wording that Texas used which said it was illegal to use the drone for surveillance.
    This appears to be an attempt at an outright ban of affordable recreational aerial photography.
    It would be interesting to hear the proposers justify that.
    It's not illegal to take all the photos you want from a Cessna or a helicopter.
    Why do these ignorant hicks want it to be illegal from a drone?
     
    Jussaguy likes this.
  3. tcope

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    3,537
    Likes Received:
    1,392
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    I could only get part way through that bill before I simply gave up reading such crap.

    "Except as otherwise provided in this section, it shall be unlawful for any person to capture an image using a drone, as defined by this act."

    Again... don't think this idiot even knows what the US Constitution is. He's certainly never bothered to read it or he' have read the First Amendment.

    "2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to:
    (a) Any person who is conducting professional or scholarly research and development and acting on behalf of an institution of higher learning, if such person is a professor, employee, or student of the institution; or under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction of or on behalf of the institution;"

    It appears the idiot who drafted this is apparently friend with a school professor who flies drones. After all... no one can fly a drone with a camera but why not employees of a school. Certainly they should be be allowed their First Amendment rights.

    These people just scare me. This is the kind of people who are in charge.

    Email sent to many of these idiots. Let the silence begin.
     
    #4 tcope, Feb 11, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2016
  4. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    I havn't read this one yet but we had one voted down last year .
    Back ta work :rolleyes:
     
  5. Meta4

    Meta4 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,750
    Likes Received:
    3,462
    dirkclod likes this.
  6. LuvMyTJ

    LuvMyTJ ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    Messages:
    6,811
    Likes Received:
    4,376
    Location:
    Live! From New York!
    That link is from last year. Is there a new bill?
     
    dirkclod likes this.
  7. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    Well that woke me back up :)
     
  8. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    I have not seen one .
     
  9. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    Where did you see this was brought back up ?
     
  10. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    Found it /
    Mississippi Legislature
    2016 Regular Session

    House Bill 582
    House Calendar | Senate Calendar | Main Menu
    Additional Information

    [​IMG] | [​IMG] As Introduced

    Description: Drone Regulation Act; create.

    Fiscal Note: No fiscal note conducted

    Background Information:
    Disposition: Active
    Deadline: General Bill/Constitutional Amendment
    Revenue: No
    Vote type required: Majority
    Effective date: July 1, 2016

    History of Actions:
    1 02/08 (H) Referred To Judiciary B

    Judiciary B*

    Principal Author: Morgan

    Title: AN ACT TO CREATE THE "DRONE REGULATION ACT"; TO PROVIDE DEFINITIONS FOR SUCH ACT; TO REGULATE THE USE OF DRONES IN THE CAPTURING OF IMAGES; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.

    Information pertaining to this measure was last updated on 02/09/16 at 16:19
    End Of Document
     
  11. dnthomas

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    16
    I was told by a member of the house that the guy was reintroducing it this year. To his credit he contacted me as he had seen some pictures and video I posted. He was concerned about the photograph ban. He told me he really liked some sunsets I had taken, he was concerned as he interpreted the bill to mean I could, potentially, be prosecuted unless I got permission from all land owners whose land was in the photo. He wanted to address drones by simply putting some language in the existing Voyeurism statute. I don't have a problem with that if you are flying low and hanging outside Windows that's a problem.
     
  12. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    Well ..Hopefully it won't go through this time ether .
     
  13. dnthomas

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    16
  14. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    Those links in my post are hot and this I don't understand
    SECTION 5. The provisions of this act shall apply unless preempted by applicablefederal law or by regulations adopted by the Federal Aviation Administration.
     
  15. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
  16. Meta4

    Meta4 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,750
    Likes Received:
    3,462
    I don't see anything substantially different in this year's version.
    Those pushing this need to read that article I mentioned above Mitchell: Look! Up in the Sky! Something New to Regulate!
    ... and think about what they are really trying to do.

    Dirk ... they are saying that if there's a clash with what the FAA or the feds are doing, the feds win.
    This might be in response to the FAA's recent advice to states not to try to regulate airspace,
     
    dirkclod likes this.
  17. dnthomas

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    16
    Anyone have any example of a "good" bill ? By good I mean not so oppressive on UAV's I would like to give them something to consider if they as me for an alternative. I do believe existing statutes would take care of their concerns which seems to be using the UAV for "peeping tom" purposes
     
  18. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    Well last year there were 11 I believe signed it but just 1 this time and I don't think it will fly this time ether .
     
  19. dirkclod

    dirkclod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    Messages:
    10,656
    Likes Received:
    5,705
    Location:
    Amory Mississippi
    Last year another member and myself sent all of them e-mails everyday with something he wrote up and we will do it again this time .
    Expect a message in the next few days ;)