Not necessarily a bad idea to try to restrict detailed aerial surveillance of certain facilities, but that bill contains some big grey areas and some strange wording.
For example, what does "specifically targeted" mean? That incidental recording of such a facility during a flight is OK?
While it gives examples of "critical infrastructure" that may not be recorded, it says "but not limited to...", so how does one know if a particular site not explicitly listed is covered, unless it is posted. That's a potential minefield. Of course minefields probably count as critical infrastructure too.