mrpp said:I then read
"You must request permission from the CAA if you plan to:
fly the aircraft on a commercial basis (i.e. conducting ‘aerial work’)
or
fly a camera/surveillance fitted aircraft within congested areas or closer (than the distances listed within Article 167) to people or properties (vehicles, vessels or structures) that are not under your control
Permission is not required if:
the aircraft will not be flown close to people or properties, and you will not get ‘valuable consideration’ (i.e. payment) from the flight, then a permission is not needed;"
So basically i guess in the UK if we have a camera/video attached we already need permission? Confused :?:
Happy Days :evil:
PsychopathRC said:Jim McAuslan, general secretary of the British Airline Pilots’ Association said ahead of his appearance: “The technology is developing quickly and we could see remote aircraft the same size as a Boeing 737 being operated commercially in our skies within ten years.”
Bit ambitious I say, lol.
"Smaller unmanned aircraft, weighing less than 20kg, only need permission from the CAA if they are being used for aerial work or if flown within a congested area or close to people or property."
So we can fly our Phantoms in say.. Large parks, as long as there are few people?
PsychopathRC said:Jim McAuslan, general secretary of the British Airline Pilots’ Association said ahead of his appearance: “The technology is developing quickly and we could see remote aircraft the same size as a Boeing 737 being operated commercially in our skies within ten years.”
Bit ambitious I say, lol.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.