Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

Gov Scott signed off on it... Effective July 1st

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by PaganLinuxGeek, May 18, 2015.

  1. RoyVa

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2015
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    449
    Location:
    Virginia
    The noose is getting tighter and tighter.
     
  2. Torcan

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2015
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    32
    "with the intent" to conduct surveillance without his or her written consent

    as long as there is no intent, and it is just a fly over on the way to somewhere else, like most of us do here, I see no running afoul of the law.
     
    Buzz313th likes this.
  3. Hjones62

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    80
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    I'm glad i don't fly a drone, the last time I checked we fly quadcopters :D
     
    Torcan likes this.
  4. tcope

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    3,509
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    This only applies existing laws to drones. Nothing is changing.
     
  5. Torcan

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2015
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    32
    and where the courts are concerned, it is all in the language and the use of a word which makes or breaks a case.
     
  6. DevildogSoldier

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2015
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    24
    The problem is that you may very well beat the charge, but you'll still get the administrative fun associated with the charge.

    And this all assumes that the system plays "fair". Prosecutorial discretion, judge's interpretation, etc.
     
  7. tcope

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    3,509
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    While I agree with the premise of this post, they could / would charge a person even without this law. You can't film or photo someone without their permission when they are not in a public place and have an expectation of privacy. This law just makes it clear that this applies to drones as well. As well it should.

    But a agree 100% with were you are coming from when something like an illegal law makes you guilty until you prove the law is illegal or does not apply.
     
    Ti22 likes this.