Goodyear Blimp Verses Phantom

Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
546
Reaction score
12
Location
Kansas
Watching the baseball world series on TV and seeing the video shots from the Goodyear blimp---wouldn't it be much less expensive to just use a Phantom?
 
The Goodyear Blimp has a slightly better endurance and can carry several crew, professional camera gear and equipment to broadcast live.
Apart from that they are pretty evenly matched.

On the other hand a drone can get in a lot closer without putting the field in deep shadow and get shots other than verticals.
This has been used for nearly two years in Australia ....
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/crick ... 93a4c727e9
 
The phantom is not really designed for professional use. You would need something more geared for live tv coverage.
Doesn't the FAA have a no fly zone for MLB post season games?
And why is it legal for the goodyear blimp to do this when it is illegal for a UAV to do the same thing?
 
Because the blimp is soft and wouldn't hurt anyone if it fell out of the sky. :D
 
No one would notice the "Goodyear" logo painted on the side of a Phantom.

-- Roger
 
Suwaneeguy said:
The phantom is not really designed for professional use. You would need something more geared for live tv coverage.
Doesn't the FAA have a no fly zone for MLB post season games?
And why is it legal for the goodyear blimp to do this when it is illegal for a UAV to do the same thing?

The TFR is probably because of the Blimp.
 
Didn't get to fly it but I got to ride on the Fuji Blimp. Blimp is slang for Air-Ship. Fuji's has 2 Porsche Turbo engines that turn generators and the motors are electric. It was a pretty weird ride.
 

Attachments

  • bf_3.JPG
    bf_3.JPG
    58 KB · Views: 413

Recent Posts

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
143,094
Messages
1,467,599
Members
104,980
Latest member
ozmtl