LeoS said:I'm not gonna debate about the semantics; the word 'drone' has been used on UAVs long before consumer grade quads are around and we certainly fall into that category when most things are considered.
But do you know what bothers people about 'drones' in our hands? Why weren't they bothered by RC planes or even helis in the past?
I think these are the reasons...
1. There are are more of these than ever.
2. They appear in more places. In the cities, close to homes.
3. They can HOVER and they can fly close to walls and grounds with greater precisions.
4. They are equipped with CAMERAS!
In short: I don't blame them :mrgreen:
gbshovel said:They wont call them RC copters any longer as soon as someone terrorizes with one.
So how long will it be before we see that is the real question.
(FlyTrex support)We do our best to advise our users to fly safely. ....If you have any other ideas for how to regulate the legality of our users' missions, we'd love to hear them.
LuvMyTJ said:In America if you live in a state where marijuana is illegal you don't go to the local park or school to smoke a joint in public. Great, now I'm gonna have to fly my 'drones' in my moms basement all day! :mrgreen:
GMANNZ said:You cant smoke a joint legally in most parts fo the world ....but people do it .... Drones, UAVs. Quads, HEli RC's ... whatever you want to call these flying machines of madness, whether the laws change or not, .... monkeys will fly them badly, responsible people will fly and say its not badly .... and other will just fly regardless ... they are out, capable and not going away anytime soon ... some of you people are way way to paranoid.
thongbong said:Yeah but weed dont kill, drones do. :lol:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.