Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

Drone Invasion:Pilot's Point of View

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by DAP-UAV, Jan 1, 2016.

  1. DAP-UAV

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2015
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    37
    Editorial copied from the current AvWeb. Just a point a view from people who use the NAS regularly. It's a bit long but worth the read.

    Written by Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness



    Just a few short months ago, I called them “flying FOD.” My opinion regarding the unmanned aircraft now proliferating has since evolved, though as a pilot, I remain concerned about this powerful and potentially dangerous technology falling into the wrong hands. That includes ignorant as well as malicious hands. I don’t want to see one on final approach, or just after takeoff, or, worse yet, not see one until I hit it.

    Unmanned aircraft, drones in the popular parlance, are selling like hotcakes, and like it or lump it, we who have invested thousands of dollars and dozens or hundreds of hours to become certificated pilots will have to deal with them. The cat is out of the bag, and it is prowling. Actually, about 700,000 cats, according to the most recent estimates. Many people (and not only pilots) are in a tizzy over this. I was, until recently, among them. I am more hopeful, now, that we will manage this transition without bloodshed.




    I have seen many drones, met many operators, and seen a glimpse of what the future may hold. In September, I attended an unmanned aircraft convention in Las Vegas, where Chris Anderson, CEO of 3D Robotics, one of the leading manufacturers of small UAS, compared the dawn of the drone age to another technological leap forward, the arrival of the Internet.

    Quadcopters and similar systems can now carry cameras and other sensors to an altitude that was previously unreachable for the average person. Anderson noted that the cost of aerial photography is now within the means of nearly everyone, that “we have democratized remote sensing.” He also predicted that whether we like it or not, “drones will win.” They simply have too much going for them, too many unique capabilities, and there is too much demand. Data available so far supports that conclusion.

    To be safe, UAS users must be educated. Anderson envisions most of that happening online. And so it has begun: My new FAA drone registration arrived by email with links to the B4UFLY mobile app, a list of basic safety guidelines (fly below 400 feet; don’t be reckless or careless; keep your UAS within sight; don’t fly near airports, stadiums, or other people; stay away from other aircraft at all times; and don’t fly under the influence). There were useful links to follow to various FAA pages, as well as to the Academy of Model Aeronautics (which has indicated to its members that there will be pushback from model aircraft enthusiasts over the new registration requirement).

    The registration process for my Phantom 3 took about five minutes, including a brief wait for a confirmation email from the FAA website for small UAS registration. I supplied my name, email, physical address (phone was optional), and credit card number (the $5 fee will be refunded for those who register by Jan. 20), and in return I got a nice, hot, electronic bowl of alphabet soup. My Phantom 3 (along with any other small UAS between 0.55 and 55 pounds that I might buy and fly in the future) is now known to the FAA as FA343L9HT7. Good thing I don’t have to spell that out on the air. Pity that I bought the stick-on decal letters at half-inch size. Those letter decal sheets come with just one “3” apiece, so I had to buy two sheets for one Phantom. A sharpie would have probably been a better choice. It only needs to be readable “without tools” by any future law enforcement or other official who collects my broken drone from, say, the steps of the state capitol, or anywhere else it had no business flying.

    As a private pilot, I will see to it that never happens. I’m well-acquainted with airspace and FARs, and, more importantly, trained to think about safety and risk management at every phase of flight, including the preparation before the flight. Those who fly unmanned aircraft for commercial work are, so far, all certificated pilots as well—the FAA has required a certificated pilot for all Section 333 exemptions granted to date. As I recently learned from flying with Frank Galella of Next Generation Aviation Services, the professionals are applying lessons learned about aviation safety over the past century of powered flight to UAS operations, and that bodes well for this segment of the unmanned operator world, and for general aviation, too.

    I’m willing to bet that professional, trained aviators represent a minority of the 700,000 new drone owners out there, but another piece of good news is that many if not most of the rest are truly toys (available online for $50 or less, with controller). The radio range of many of those systems is limited to about 100 feet, give or take. Toy drones will stop flying pretty fast if they get beyond that range.

    This leaves another segment, really the only segment I personally worry about: the untrained, new owner of a DJI Phantom or similar system that is very easy to fly and has the range to get into real trouble. (I noted with horror that the documentation for mine indicates a service ceiling of 19,685 feet, while the published radio telemetry range is just over 16,000 feet; there are after-market systems that can extend radio range much farther.)

    [​IMG]
    AOPA file photo.
    I cringe at the thought of my teenage self getting his hands on one of these. My teenage self would probably be able to tell me within a few minutes of startup exactly at what altitude the signal fades. If registration makes even a few of my former selves behave themselves, and get a little bit educated prior to launch, I’m inclined to think that’s better than nothing, which is basically the guidance offered in product packaging when it comes to airspace and aviation regulations. Manufacturers whose packaging I've seen so far basically tell customers to “look it up” when it comes to applicable requirements and laws. There seems to be room for improvement.

    In the coming months, the FAA will finalize new rules for commercial operation of unmanned aircraft, and that long-awaited rule will almost certainly mandate formal training. Hobbyists may remain free to do what they want below 400 feet agl, and it may remain up to them to self-educate. Time will tell.

    Meanwhile, pilots of manned aircraft do have an opportunity to help. We can all brief our drone-flying friends on some of the key points, including the basics of airspace and the value of checklists and standardized safety procedures. The more ambitious among us (myself included) might even work more actively along these lines, organizing an airport open house and inviting the local community to participate, as some have already done.

    We also can learn from the unmanned aircraft operators, and educate ourselves on the particulars of these systems and how they work. And what they are capable of. That knowledge can inform our concern, focusing on where the risks lie rather than where they do not. If nothing else, notams now include advance alerts of any commercial UAS operations in a given area, and they are worth a look.

    I have to confess that I have indeed “gone native” to some extent, after getting my hands on a drone of my own. I’ve thought more than once about Heart of Darkness, both the original novella by Joseph Conrad and the later movie adaptation, Apocalypse Now. The protagonist, Christopher Marlow, journeys up the Congo River to find a station agent named Kurtz who had gone mad, and who has convinced the natives to worship him.

    Among Conrad’s points, there is little beyond context that separates “savage” from “civilized” human, that we are all closer to being seduced into madness than we might realize. I’ve wondered whether I’m more like Marlow, who manages to retain perspective on the world he’s from, or Kurtz, who loses all perspective and embraces the “savage” world exclusively. I still love to fly a Super Decathlon, or even a Cessna (in a pinch), and I expect to be drawn to flight for as long as I’m able, and beyond.

    But the thing about these drones is, they really are aircraft, small though they may be, and while they won’t take you for the ride, they demand every bit as much focus and forethought and, yes, skill to operate safely as any other aircraft. So operating them is more rewarding than I had expected, from a pilot’s point of view. The metaphorical river has led me to a surprising destination. There is not so much that separates us, the manned from the unmanned aviators, after all.
     
    0DRK3RT and GregWV like this.
  2. The Suburban Hippie

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2014
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    83
    I will gladly be inline for that formal training and certification. I just hope it isn't prohibitively expensive, and has unnecessary standards.

    Probably the biggest problem I have with the hobby registration is it isn't incentive based. If it were a system that if you register, you could sell your pictures and stuff, I would sign up right now.

    As it is, it is just a heavy handed threat.


    As for unreasonable rules for example, 2/3rds of the country has diabetes. When a pilot flies people or cargo around there is a great risk. For drones not the same risk. If it falls out of the sky there is a risk of hitting something, but not as great as say a plane, that is larger, and if it hits something, it will destroy it. Drones not so much. Maybe a dent in your car.

    Also, most drones now a days have return and land when the battery goes low. Say the person passes out. The drone hoves in place until the battery gets low, and then returns and lands...
     
    johnp44 likes this.
  3. Sabalon

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2015
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    45
    I think my teenage self would be more of a danger to window of the blonde that lived two houses up than anything at a respectable altitude. But as I think of other stupid things done at that age, I'm sure I would have found tons of stupid things to do at less than 60 feet!
     
  4. DAP-UAV

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2015
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    37
    The danger is not the drone falling out of the sky. The danger is the drones flying around with other manned aircraft at the same attitudes and not see each other. The danger is the drone bringing down a manned aircraft. Yes the drone operator has no skin I the game, but everyone else up there DOES! I think you completely missed the point. You brought up all the issues that are not issues, and missed the most important one. Other people's lives are at stake when you fly your drone at 400-500 ft plus and for 2, 3 maybe 4 miles or more. Many drones today are capable of this and more.
     
  5. basildane

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2014
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    3
    That's a staggeringly one sided view of the situation. So here is another viewpoint. Manned aircraft are the danger to people. The ONLY danger. A neighbor of my coworker was obliterated by a crashing aircraft here in Maryland. Her children were killed too. Plane Crashes Into Maryland Home, Killing Family and 3 Aboard

    Shortly after that, I saw another one crash in Fort Meade on my way home from work. I've also seen private planes crash into Rt 50 outside of Washington. Just yesterday I was walking my dog and saw a Cessna suddenly "shut down" and start a left turn spiral toward the ground. He got below my line of vision through the trees and I was listening for the crash, but at the last second he got it started and climbed steeply, got over me, and shut down again, and repeated this once more. I don't know if this was on purpose or not, but it sure looked dangerous.

    My point is this. My plastic toy that I can carry with my little finger (literally) threatens no one. But I see with my own eyes the death and destruction caused by manned aircraft right near my own family and home.

    Don't even get me started with the helicopters. We one guy who "buzzes" our neighborhood approximately every 3 weeks. We know he's coming when the entire house shakes and we look out and see him barely over the tree tops. He often makes a 90 degree left turn directly over our garden - I mean helicopter is sideways - rotor is vertical - and heads East. He's a criminal and needs to be locked up, it's terrifying to watch. If he made a mistake he would kill my entire family.

    These are the problem people, not people playing with toys.
     
    WRXJIM, mmtphoto and aka1ceman like this.
  6. DAP-UAV

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2015
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ok. So your point is to we should ban aircraft? Right. Good argument. Toys eh?
     
  7. RasterEyes

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    25
    I really hope the FAA institutes a fair, reasonable, and prudent licensing path for professional drone operations. If they do I will be one of the first in line.
    For now I'm going to learn all I can and try to spread the message of how important it is for folks to fly safe and be respectful.
    I think that for the most part the ones who fail to read the manual, safety rules, etc will also be the ones who loose their expensive "toys" in heavy winds, rain, trees, or freak out and crash the first time they are in mid flight and the gps fails (eek I need to practice in Atti mode more too!). I just hope that evolution happens with as little damage to bystanders as possible.

    For now the responsibility is squarely in the hands of pilots like the ones on this forum to reach out to new pilots, our RC flying brothers, and to the public to educate them to the reality of this new era.


    Sent from my iPad using PhantomPilots mobile app
     
    DAP-UAV and Tim in Florida like this.
  8. basildane

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2014
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    3
    No, don't ban them, just create reasonable restrictions. Such as only flying around in a circle above the airport.

    You see, it's not so nice when the shoe is on the other foot.
     
  9. djphantom2015

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    22
  10. fvader

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    58
    I think the true fear from the gov. is not hobbyist whom will fly into a plane at 10,000ft, it's that a terrorist will strap a bomb to one and fly it into some place/plane.
    A friend of the family is a commercial airline pilot and he said they hit birds frequently.
    it's not that a drone can't do damage, but he really didn't seemed overly concerned.
    hobbyist however, are quick to be judgmental about the apparent lack of safety that every drone operator is GOING TO FOR A MATTER OF FACT exhibit at some time, and only registration, intimidation and snarky internet comments can thwart. as with guns, it's really not your every day law abiding citizen that is the problem, it's the bad people who do bad things regardless of rules and laws that are the problem.
     
  11. Newgmole

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2016
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    2

    All valid points.


    "It's good to be king"
    Michael Badnarik
     
  12. Sagebrush

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    552
    Likes Received:
    156
    That plastic toy will go through the plexiglass windshield of any light aircraft.

    SB
     
  13. Wyattroa

    Joined:
    May 31, 2016
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    32
    If an aircraft can't sustain a drone strike in the sky, then it has no business flying up there. These airplanes takes test where they fire large turkeys into the engines, wings, nose, and front window of the planes. Our drones will not take down a plane and kill people. You need to really step away and think about it. Can you please tell me where there has ever been a drone strike to a plane?

    Also, planes crash all the time, are we trying to ban planes? No, thats silly, so why do it with drones?
     
  14. Sagebrush

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    552
    Likes Received:
    156
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Wyatt: Bird strikes are serious. Google it.

    Let's keep the airways safe. ;)

    SB
     
  15. turbulence

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    40