- Joined
- Feb 29, 2016
- Messages
- 246
- Reaction score
- 52
- Age
- 43
Very interesting read indeed. Considering Disney is seeking an exemption from their own NFZ in order to fly their own drones, I question the loophole pointed out above.
Source: Disney loved its no-fly zone — until it wanted to fly its own drones
EDIT: If you read the NOTAM, you can quickly see why Disney is seeking an exemption to their own NFZ. It is because they have specifically made a provision that unmanned and radio controlled aircraft are prohibited.
"ALL AIRCRAFT FLIGHT OPERATIONS, INCLUDING UNMANNED AND REMOTE CONTROLLED AIRCRAFT, ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN A 3 NMR...."
NOTAM: 4/3634 NOTAM Details
So, if there ever was a loophole, it appears that it has been closed.
Source: Disney loved its no-fly zone — until it wanted to fly its own drones
EDIT: If you read the NOTAM, you can quickly see why Disney is seeking an exemption to their own NFZ. It is because they have specifically made a provision that unmanned and radio controlled aircraft are prohibited.
"ALL AIRCRAFT FLIGHT OPERATIONS, INCLUDING UNMANNED AND REMOTE CONTROLLED AIRCRAFT, ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN A 3 NMR...."
NOTAM: 4/3634 NOTAM Details
So, if there ever was a loophole, it appears that it has been closed.
Last edited:
