Are you better off using wide and crop in PP than medium?

Joined
Sep 18, 2013
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Are you better off using wide and crop in post production than medium mode with the H3B? I'm not sure I understand how these modes work, is it basically throwing away pixels while recording ? If so, isn't it just better if I just correct it with software later?
 
Re: Are you better off using wide and crop in PP than medium

Here is some good info regarding the hero3 blacks modes. http://abekislevitz.com/understanding-your-new-gopro/

The way the fov modes work are as a sensor crop for lower fov but as the full sensor is 3840x2880 in 4:3 ratio the cropped modes arent blowing up pixels just using pixel binning or interpolation.

p91d.png


1920x1080p in wide medium and narrow modes all have the same amount of pixels but they are gathered from more pixels off the sensor in the wide modes where the narrow mode is pretty much just the central 1920x1080 pixels.

If shooting 1080p wide then cropping you will lose image quality compared to shooting in medium or narrow modes. If you shoot in 4k then cropping will be more or less the same as what the camera does itself but the 4k mode is only limited to 15p. 2.7k 2716x1524 does allow for a bit of room in post to crop and not lose image quality as much. Any time you zoom more then 100% you are losing quality as you are simply making pixels larger. Using a higher res source and cropping to lower res allows for zoom with minimal quality loss.

Reading Abes post he describes the different modes pro's and cons as even modes in the same res and fov use different methods of binning or interpolation to get the final image. The higher frame rates are limited to how much pixel processing can be done and so tend to be a little lower quality and also faster frame rates increase shutter speeds reducing low light performance. The wide modes tend to have the best image quality especially in the slower frame rates as these use the most sensor area and blend mulitple pixels into one, some other faster modes will bin the extra pixels rather then blend them which reduces image quality.

Now if as rumoured in the next gopro we get high bitrate 4k30 video or 2.7k60 this will allow you to use post zoom and crop when exporting to 1080p with minimal quality loss. You can shoot wide and crop to narrow the same as the camera does in the hero3 black, also 4k scaled down to 1080p will generally be better then what the camera can do itself in real time so image quality is going to be better at full fov or zoomed. This is what the biggest advantage of shooting in 4k30 is not necessarily to shoot in 4k for a 4k display as these are still very expensive and not very common.
 
Re: Are you better off using wide and crop in PP than medium

martcerv said:
Here is some good info regarding the hero3 blacks modes. http://abekislevitz.com/understanding-your-new-gopro/

The way the fov modes work are as a sensor crop for lower fov but as the full sensor is 3840x2880 in 4:3 ratio the cropped modes arent blowing up pixels just using pixel binning or interpolation.

p91d.png


1920x1080p in wide medium and narrow modes all have the same amount of pixels but they are gathered from more pixels off the sensor in the wide modes where the narrow mode is pretty much just the central 1920x1080 pixels.

If shooting 1080p wide then cropping you will lose image quality compared to shooting in medium or narrow modes. If you shoot in 4k then cropping will be more or less the same as what the camera does itself but the 4k mode is only limited to 15p. 2.7k 2716x1524 does allow for a bit of room in post to crop and not lose image quality as much. Any time you zoom more then 100% you are losing quality as you are simply making pixels larger. Using a higher res source and cropping to lower res allows for zoom with minimal quality loss.

Reading Abes post he describes the different modes pro's and cons as even modes in the same res and fov use different methods of binning or interpolation to get the final image. The higher frame rates are limited to how much pixel processing can be done and so tend to be a little lower quality and also faster frame rates increase shutter speeds reducing low light performance. The wide modes tend to have the best image quality especially in the slower frame rates as these use the most sensor area and blend mulitple pixels into one, some other faster modes will bin the extra pixels rather then blend them which reduces image quality.

Now if as rumoured in the next gopro we get high bitrate 4k30 video or 2.7k60 this will allow you to use post zoom and crop when exporting to 1080p with minimal quality loss. You can shoot wide and crop to narrow the same as the camera does in the hero3 black, also 4k scaled down to 1080p will generally be better then what the camera can do itself in real time so image quality is going to be better at full fov or zoomed. This is what the biggest advantage of shooting in 4k30 is not necessarily to shoot in 4k for a 4k display as these are still very expensive and not very common.

So if I understood what you said correctly, 2.7k30 and then cropping in PP will give me around the same quality as 1080p30. So why would I ever use 1080p30 over 2.7k30?

Also, again if I understood you correctly I would lose quality by correcting 1080 wide, so if I actually wanted less fish eye I should set it to medium/narrow to start with and not rely on PP?
 
Re: Are you better off using wide and crop in PP than medium

yalag said:
So if I understood what you said correctly, 2.7k30 and then cropping in PP will give me around the same quality as 1080p30. So why would I ever use 1080p30 over 2.7k30?

Also, again if I understood you correctly I would lose quality by correcting 1080 wide, so if I actually wanted less fish eye I should set it to medium/narrow to start with and not rely on PP?

that's pretty much correct.

2.7k really offers a lot of flexibility and the highest possible quality.

so why shoot at 1080p wide? simple = easier to edit, with smaller files that can play back in realtime, etc.
and no need to scale down to 1080 prior to uploading to youtube/Tv.
one less step to deal with.

plus, I often shoot with Video+Stills, which maxes out at 1080.

But think of it this way, all the music we listen to now is generally MP3's
..which is a compressed format. uncompressed CD quality audio is considerably higher quality, but we're just fine with compressed MP3s at less than 256bit,.etc.
the same kind of applies to video, higher quality is ideal, but few will notice that video was shot at 1080 instead of 2.7k.
 
Re: Are you better off using wide and crop in PP than medium

So here's my strategy let me know if it makes sense. I'm not a fan of fisheye, so for scenes that does not require slow motion I'm going to shoot in 2.7k30 wide and then fixes the fisheye in PP down to 1080p. This should give me a 1080p video that has just about as good of a quality as one could get from the H3B.

Alternatively for scenes that require slow motion, again to keep the fisheye to a minimum, I would shoot 1080p60 medium (and maybe even narrow) and then just not touch it in PP at all.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
143,066
Messages
1,467,354
Members
104,934
Latest member
jody.paugh@fullerandsons.