Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

23 Minutes, really? A modified P1 can do better than that.

Discussion in 'Pro/Adv Discussion' started by IflyinWY, Apr 9, 2015.

  1. IflyinWY

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    939
    Location:
    Where the deer and the antelope play
    Why would DJI market a new bird which has already been outperformed by mods to the P1?
    I know, as do many of you, they have the resources to proceed forward, we've given them that.
    DJI could develop a Phantom with increased flight time and more capabilities than the P3.
    I'm not guessing, nor am I speculating, I am wondering why they would not take the steps to offer what is wanted. Don't bother telling me how advanced the P3 is, I can read. Focus on the question.

    Why would DJI market a Phantom which was outperformed months ago?

    Doubt what I am saying?
    http://www.phantompilots.com/threads/my-fc40-p1-transformation-3-6km-11-800ft-fpv.37775/

    Serious question, expecting serious replies.
     
    dirkclod likes this.
  2. CactusJackSlade

    Joined:
    May 29, 2014
    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    114
    You lost me, that is not a Phantom, that is a custom built quad using FC40 parts and the capability to add big *** batteries. If you want a long range long flight quad you can go a lot further than that and fly for an hour if you want to build it. Could DJI do it? Certainly, but not without severely departing the current airframe design/size/shape.

    Apples and oranges to me really.

    That being said, yes I wish they would have made a larger battery option on the P3 if they changed it to a 4 cell anyway (P2 batteries unlikely to work?) I wanted more flight time. I was even hoping for a slightly larger air frame with larger props, lower KV motors and 6 cell battery.

    "Surely you can't be serious?.... I am serious and don't call me Shirley".... ;-)
     
  3. TeamYankee

    Joined:
    May 30, 2014
    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    Swansea, Wales, UK
    Flight time is not the be all and end all of the airframe..

    If you want to fly longer, then use a bigger airframe/make your own.
    The P3 offers most of the trimmings of the Inspire 1 at a cheaper price.
     
  4. Apparition

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    965
    Likes Received:
    324
    Location:
    USA
    You have to be in their shoes, they have to hit the market that will make them the most money and be competitive. Yes, they could double the flight time but at what cost to them? If it prices them out of the market and cuts sales by 2/3's it's not a sound business decision.
     
  5. bbfpv

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    3,744
    Likes Received:
    1,092
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    it's the same business model that every tech company in the world uses. incremental upgrades = more $$
     
  6. 4wd

    4wd

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    2,532
    Likes Received:
    421
    Location:
    North York Moors
    Flight time is longer than the inspire. With the P2 I find 15 minutes is usually plenty in one go unless you are into trying to break distance records
     
  7. Kingfish28

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2015
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    84
    I'm trying to understand why you are comparing an out of the box model (P3), to a modified model "outperformed by mods to the P1?"

    This comparison doesn't make any sense.
    It would be like comparing two cars, one that is stock and one that has had a turbo added to it and then complaining that the all stock car is slower.....
     
    Birdu2 likes this.
  8. Entropy512

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2014
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's also the fact that the modified P1 has, as far as I can tell, a low-quality camera that is NOT gimbal-mounted.

    The P3 has approximately the same flight time rating as the P2V+ does, despite a heavier payload (aluminum camera body instead of plastic, larger camera sensor and hence heavier camera optics, and don't forget the optical flow sensor setup for low-altitude position holding.), which is pretty impressive.
     
  9. IflyinWY

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    939
    Location:
    Where the deer and the antelope play
    Most of what I've read makes sense, the business model, the market and more, even the opinions. I am just amazed DJI would underperform. I don't know why I am, I just am.

    "Go big or go home", doesn't seem to apply as much anymore. :confused:
     
  10. SkinFluteSwe

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2015
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    Sweden
  11. IflyinWY

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    939
    Location:
    Where the deer and the antelope play
    I like it. ROFLMAO