OK... I was there. Are you the Post Police?
But since you brought it up. In looking at your comment there. jeff3333 makes a point there I think you completely missed. It's not that there isn't a place for the technology... It's "Is the Phantom body needed to fill that void".
But...
Gosh Tomas... It isn't even a post topic there, just a comment. Why are you complaining about my post? And no I didn't go to page 2... Is it your comment? If it is it is a valid post topic.
I have a P4P+ and love it. But maybe the "Phantom" form factor is done, cooked, old fashion and otherwise yesterday's news. It's body style function was to "Fit it all in" ... Has technology made that requirement as out of place as film cameras. Yes I know people still use film cameras. We...
I have proof that they do test fly at least some of the aircraft. My new P4P+ has a flight in China November 28 2016. (almost a year before I got it) The flight was two minutes at 13 feet and a distance of 121 feet. The flight was in Shenzhen Shi China.
However I did have update problems...
I had this exact same problem. The bird updated using Asistant 2. However because the controller refused to work with my WIFI I did have to update using the SD card. (Yet Skypixels worked fine on it.) That went well and is easy. All was good but when I went to fly it it said version...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.