Recent content by KiloOne

  1. K

    P4P+ remote control GL300E (integral display)

    Adam, yes, still available, has been sitting on shelf . I bought GL300F just after I started this thread and have been using it. Would be easiest if you email my wife to handle this, pull out the lowercase letters in this for her address: c%Ta*Hr&Sm^Ke(Dn @ r^Go(Sa!Qd)Gr#Au)Kn#Fn!Ae*Fr~C.com...
  2. K

    P4P+ remote control GL300E (integral display)

    Hi Bee, I am away from home for another week to ten days and can not look at the labels but I assume it is FCC version, after all I bought it here. Will ship to Australia, just charge you actual extra cost. Will look into when I get home. Dale
  3. K

    Time to File a Class Action Lawsuit Regarding the P4P+

    More like $434 plus tax... for the GL300F, HDMI module and iPad hood, if you want to stay with comparable hardware. AND, you have to own an iPad.
  4. K

    P4P+ remote control GL300E (integral display)

    Still for sale, open to offers!
  5. K

    P4P+ remote control GL300E (integral display)

    This almost new (purchased 3/26/17) ) GL300E transmitter has the outdoor viewable integral display. It also has an HDMI port. Selling so I can buy a GL300F which allows developer SDK to be used. $450.00 delivered to US address. Dale
  6. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    Interesting that your GL300E has no model #/CE label printed on the back if it (see Jared's 1st picture for example)
  7. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    I'm confused, your pics seem to be of an E?
  8. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    Thanks! Option 2 worked fine. Hope you find a way to access the data feed!
  9. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    I am giving up on trying to get access to the data feed from the RC. Does anyone know a quick way to erase my GL300E and restore all apps/settings back to factory defaults? I want to sell/trade my GL300E for a GL300F so I can run Litchi and use developer resources.
  10. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    I am assuming we need the privileges of root to edit the build.prop file and to be able to disable or uninstall DJI apps so they don't take over the data feed or something like that. I have had ZERO luck getting root privileges I hope someone with rooting expertise jumps in here.
  11. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    Need to see it in device manager as an Android Device with Android Composite ADB Device driver or adb won't see it (likely a driver install issue). I use universal driver from here: TechKnow_Universal_ADB_Driver_v0.8-HcH-(www.TechKnow.me).7z You know you have succeeded when you can enter 'adb...
  12. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    Brimba, As you have suggested, I think I am now at the point where I have to root the P4P+ to proceed. This is my only RC for my P4P+ but I have basically resigned myself to the fact that I will be having to buy a GL300F anyway so that I can run the SDK and use Litchi/Autopilot/Dronedeploy...
  13. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    :) but you said I need root to get Play Services installed, so far your advice is a little questionable (not complaining though, thanks for suggesting!) I really do not want to root if I do not have to. What is it specifically that you think I need root privileges to enable or install?
  14. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    Politics aside, I now have Play Services installed and running (no rooting needed). I loaded CPU-Z onto the P4P+ RC which allowed me to make a more educated guess at the Play Services apk version that was needed. Here is the filename of the Play Services apk that runs on the P4P+ RC...
  15. K

    P4P+ remote - THIRD PARTY APPS. Big news out today!!

    I did not realize that. I guess what bothers me most is that there must be two factions at DJI, one that realizes the benefits of having an SDK and presenting as open source and another that wants total control of the future. Too bad we are caught in the middle!