Because most people won't think twice about it, and/or don't know the new rules.
Second, the absurdity that an agency that manages the safety of $150 million passenger aircraft now regulating 0.55 pound flying cameras wouldn't even be on the lay persons radar.
Model aircraft have had the capability of entering controlled airspace for 60+ years. Again, if this about safety and not money why is the FAA so interested in money, but not safety in this matter?
Who are you referring to and what point are you trying to make? You are the only that used the word nonsense in the last 3 pages.
As a pilot, for the time being you get to enjoy an artificial monopoly on commercial drone operation. I don't necessarily fault you for liking it. A blacksmith that...
Here's Why Commercial Drones Just Got Legalized
Here's one case the FAA lost. It eventually went to another judge, was reversed and the parties settled. There are other cases on going. There are quite a few problems with the FAA defining small UAS as aircraft in the language of current...
A lot of people have challenged the legality of the FAA enforcing anything below 400 feet for small drones. Some lawsuits have successfully ruled in the favor, although not all. With litigation on going.
The FAA is supposed to encourage safety. You can fly the exact same way/path as a hobby...
I have a brand new P3A arriving tomorrow and looking for basic advice for a newbie. I have experience flying cheaper quads with brushed motors. I plan on reading all the manuals but personal advice often trumps translated Chinese engineering small print.
Is there any protocol for breaking in...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.