Recent content by hpmoon

Again: "effective ISO of 500" relative to what camera sensor? Apples to oranges unless you're referring to an actual, specific camera model/generation.

But really, this misunderstands the reality of ISO numbers being apples to oranges: there is no benchmark of "an effective ISO" because 500 on one camera could look like 1000 on another. If you understand the nature of log curves, then you understand how it's critical to lock ISO at capture...

www.vimeo.com/hpmoon/ruby

There's no such thing.

After a couple of years, I found this (not much discussion about H.265, surprisingly). While the conclusion is very color-grading centric, let's keep in mind that the principal reason to use H.265 is for maintaining detail (and avoiding severe macroblocking) when there is a lot of moving...

But, how confident are you that these numbers are outdated now? Just venturing to guess, simply because it's new FW? Or did the actual numerical ranges shift significantly? Otherwise, your question doesn't help (or isn't relevant).

www.vimeo.com/hpmoon/moonranch

This is 100% wrong. The purpose of a LUT is to restore what things looked like upon capture, and specifically to convert back to REC.709 color space. A clue as to how this is reliable, is the fact that DJI at some point revised the methodology to lock down ISO at 500, thereby stabilizing the...