Here's a near-direct comparison.
I shot this video of the Candlestick Park demolition with the P3P. There is a near-constant 25 mph wind blowing there and it can get even more gusty. It was tricky and the P3P moved around quite a bit, but the gimbal performed well. You can judge the results...
The P3 landing gear won't get in the shot because the camera always faces forward. The props only get in when you make very fast changes in direction or fly in heavy wind. But if you're careful and fly smoothly, you'll get awesome video with no props appearing.
As for the quality of the camera...
I own both, and there is no question the Inspire results in a somewhat more cinematic film largely due to its larger size and weight -- making it more stable -- and retractable landing gear. However, I find the P3P to be far more practical for most situations. More portable, easier to get into...
Here's a great way to safely remove the P3's stock UV filter. Mine was on so tight I thought it was glued on, but this worked perfectly:
http://forum.dji.com/thread-14931-1-1.html
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.